PNG vs AVIF Compression - A Detailed Comparison

AVIF represents the cutting edge of image compression technology. This guide compares PNG and AVIF compression to help you understand when and why to convert your PNG files to AVIF format.
PNG vs AVIF: Compression Overview

| Feature | PNG | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Compression Type | Lossless | Lossy/Lossless |
| Typical File Size | Baseline | 80-90% smaller |
| Quality | Perfect | Excellent |
| Transparency | Yes | Yes |
| Browser Support | 100% | 93%+ |
How PNG Compression Works
PNG uses lossless compression (DEFLATE algorithm):
Characteristics:
- No data loss during compression
- Perfect pixel-for-pixel reproduction
- Limited compression ratio
- Best for graphics, not photographs
Result: Large files but perfect quality.
How AVIF Compression Works
AVIF uses the AV1 codec with advanced techniques:
Characteristics:
- Intra-frame prediction
- Transform coding
- Entropy coding
- Optional lossless mode
- Film grain synthesis
Result: Dramatically smaller files with excellent quality.
File Size Comparison
Real-world testing with various image types:
Photographs
| Resolution | PNG | AVIF (85%) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4K (3840×2160) | 18.2 MB | 1.4 MB | 92% |
| 1080p (1920×1080) | 5.1 MB | 420 KB | 92% |
| 720p (1280×720) | 2.3 MB | 180 KB | 92% |
Graphics with Transparency
| Type | PNG | AVIF (90%) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logo | 45 KB | 8 KB | 82% |
| Icon set | 120 KB | 22 KB | 82% |
| UI mockup | 850 KB | 145 KB | 83% |
Screenshots
| Content | PNG | AVIF (90%) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text-heavy | 380 KB | 65 KB | 83% |
| Mixed content | 520 KB | 95 KB | 82% |
| Graphics | 290 KB | 48 KB | 83% |
Quality Comparison
At Equivalent Visual Quality
When targeting the same perceived quality:
| Metric | PNG | AVIF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| File size | 100% | 10-15% | AVIF 85-90% smaller |
| SSIM score | 1.00 | 0.98+ | Imperceptible |
| Visual quality | Perfect | Near-perfect | Minimal |
At Various AVIF Quality Settings
| AVIF Quality | vs PNG Size | Visual Quality |
|---|---|---|
| 95% (max) | 20% | Indistinguishable |
| 85% (recommended) | 10-12% | Excellent |
| 75% (web) | 7-8% | Very good |
| 60% (minimum) | 4-5% | Noticeable artifacts |
When PNG Compression Wins
PNG is better for:
1. Perfect Pixel Accuracy
When every pixel must be exact:
- Technical diagrams
- Screenshots for documentation
- Reference images
2. Images Requiring Editing
For ongoing editing workflows:
- No quality loss on re-save
- Original data preserved
- Maximum flexibility
3. Maximum Compatibility
When you need 100% browser support:
- Email images
- Legacy system support
- Universal accessibility
When AVIF Compression Wins
AVIF is better for:
1. Web Publishing
For websites and apps:
- 80-90% smaller files
- Faster page loads
- Better Core Web Vitals
2. Storage Optimization
For large image libraries:
- Massive storage savings
- Reduced bandwidth costs
- Faster transfers
3. High-Resolution Content
For 4K and larger images:
- Practical file sizes
- Maintains detail
- Efficient delivery
Transparency Compression
Both support transparency, but compression differs:
| Metric | PNG | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha precision | 8-bit | 8-bit |
| Transparent file size | Baseline | 75-85% smaller |
| Edge quality | Perfect | Excellent |
| Semi-transparency | Perfect | Excellent |
Encoding and Decoding Speed
| Operation | PNG | AVIF | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Encoding | Fast | Slow | AVIF 5-10x slower |
| Decoding | Fast | Fast | Similar speed |
| Hardware support | Universal | Growing | GPU decode available |
Recommendation: Encode once (during build), decode many times (when viewing).
Practical Conversion Guide
Converting PNG to AVIF
Use our PNG to AVIF converter:
- Upload your PNG files
- Select quality (85% recommended)
- Download AVIF versions
- Implement with PNG fallback
Recommended Settings
| Use Case | AVIF Quality | Expected Savings |
|---|---|---|
| Web graphics | 85% | 85% smaller |
| Photographs | 80% | 90% smaller |
| Icons/logos | 90% | 80% smaller |
| Thumbnails | 75% | 92% smaller |
Implementation Strategy
HTML with Fallback
<picture>
<source srcset="image.avif" type="image/avif">
<source srcset="image.png" type="image/png">
<img src="image.png" alt="Description">
</picture>
CSS Background
.hero {
background-image: url('hero.png');
}
@supports (background-image: url('test.avif')) {
.hero {
background-image: url('hero.avif');
}
}
Use Case Scenarios
Scenario 1: E-commerce Product Images
Converting 1000 product photos:
| Format | Total Size | Load Time Impact |
|---|---|---|
| PNG | 4.5 GB | Baseline |
| AVIF | 450 MB | 90% faster |
Scenario 2: Portfolio Website
Converting 50 high-res images:
| Format | Total Size | Bandwidth/month |
|---|---|---|
| PNG | 890 MB | High |
| AVIF | 90 MB | 90% savings |
Scenario 3: Mobile App Assets
Converting 200 UI elements:
| Format | App Size Impact | User Experience |
|---|---|---|
| PNG | +180 MB | Slower install |
| AVIF | +25 MB | Fast install |
Browser Support Considerations
| Browser | AVIF Support | Fallback Needed |
|---|---|---|
| Chrome 85+ | Yes | No |
| Firefox 93+ | Yes | No |
| Safari 16+ | Yes | No |
| Edge 121+ | Yes | No |
| Older browsers | No | Yes (use PNG) |
Current global support: ~93%
Quality Assessment Tools
Compare PNG vs AVIF quality using:
- SSIM (Structural Similarity) - Measures perceived quality
- PSNR (Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio) - Technical quality metric
- Visual inspection - Side-by-side comparison
- Butteraugli - Google's perceptual quality metric
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AVIF better than PNG?
For compression efficiency, yes. AVIF achieves 80-90% smaller files. PNG is better when you need perfect lossless quality or 100% browser compatibility.
Does converting PNG to AVIF lose quality?
With lossy AVIF, technically yes. But at 85%+ quality, the loss is imperceptible. You can also use lossless AVIF for perfect quality.
Should I replace all PNG with AVIF?
For web use, convert to AVIF with PNG fallback. Keep original PNG files for archiving and editing.
How much smaller is AVIF than PNG?
Typically 80-92% smaller for photographs, 75-85% smaller for graphics with transparency.
Does AVIF support transparency like PNG?
Yes! AVIF fully supports alpha channel transparency with excellent compression.
Conclusion
AVIF dramatically outperforms PNG in compression efficiency while maintaining excellent visual quality. For web publishing, converting PNG to AVIF offers:
- 80-90% file size reduction
- Maintained visual quality
- Transparency support
- Growing browser support
Use AVIF for web delivery, keep PNG for archiving and editing.
Related articles: PNG vs JPG Comparison | AVIF Compatibility Guide
Related tools: PNG to WebP | PNG to JPG | Image Compressor